Migrants
10 RepliesReplies

I agree. Europe (and in particular those nations that sponsored uprisings) should take the majority of the burden. These poor souls are running for their lives.


I think it's painting a very good image of Europe as a liberal, Christian continent that welcomes victims of war with open arms.

Is it not just a symptom of guilt for having contributed to starting it in the firs place?
What's the difference between Europe's role in North Africa and Russia's in the Crimea? I put it to you, that there's very little.

There is undoubtably a sense of responsibility resounding throughout the European nations. Not just because of any political impact they may have had but also because its the humanitarian thing to do.
German should be congratulated on taking a lead in this.
And as for Germany sending out messages to encourage those to risk theri lives, well, staying in a war torn country is risking your life too!

At least Russia are involved in contributing to it now with airstrikes.
All these governments are as bad as one another it would seem.

Whatever the cause, I think that it's amazing that Germany is going to take up to 1.5 million refugees. Merkel for a Nobel Peace Prize?


I feel sorry for the villages that have been swamped in the south of the country. I put myself in the same position and it makes me feel very sad.

We have a moral duty in Europe to help the people whose lifes we have contributed to detroying. Albeit as individuals we had little to no involvement but our governements are accountable. It's sad that we, as the lowly citizens, pay the price EG Paris and Aeroflot.